For my Digital Portfolio I created a prezi to express myself. The link is https://prezi.com/secure/e2017bc4c716fecca82feacafc9781ee486de216/.
Enjoy! =)
About Me
- Sara E. Perez
- Hidalgo, Texas, United States
- 24/7/365 Educator! I really love what I do and love to implement technology as much as I can, to meet the needs of my digital native students. I consider myself a teekducator (technology geek+educator) and like to take advantage of Web2.0. I'm an Instructional Media Masters Graduate from Wilkes University and am currently finalizing my Principalship from Lamar University! I'm a 5th Grade teacher @ Valley View 5th Grade Campus, this is my fifth year teaching! =)
Sunday, May 1, 2011
(u07a1) Self-Evaluation
My digital project that I've chosen to
self evaluate is a Glog on Main Idea that I created during a previous Wilkes
course, EDIM508. The grading criteria that my instructor posted for this
project is as follows:
Category
|
Point
Value
|
Required specifications - includes at
least two hyperlinks, two still images and credits/citations
|
25
|
Layout and Design
|
10
|
Integration of video content via a
Discovery Education streaming builder and an assessment component via
a Discovery Education streaming builder
|
20
|
Reflection Blog (20) and Glog
embedded or linked in blog post (5)
|
25
|
Total
|
80
|
In this assignment I received 80/80
points when graded by the instructor. Although I feel that the grading criterion
was not necessarily a rubric in which I could follow to help me build my Glog,
I constructed my own rubric from Rubistar. Because my students are 3rd graders I
have to take their age into consideration when structuring my Glogs in an easy
to maneuver manner, so that they don't become lost and will want to participate
in more. The rubric in which I used as part of this assignment to help me is
posted below. I've evaluated myself as follows:
Glog Appearance and Content : Online
Presentation
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Text - Font Choice &
Formatting
|
Font
formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance
readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully
planned to enhance readability.
|
Font formatting has been carefully
planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to
|
Font formatting makes it very
difficult to read the material.
|
Sequencing of Information and
Transition
|
Information
is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of
material that might come next in sequence. Demonstrates an effecitve smooth
flow and transition.
|
Most information is organized in a
clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place.
Demonstrates an OK flow and transition.
|
Some information is logically
sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place.
Demonstrates a puzzling flow and transition.
|
There is no clear plan for the
organization of information. Demonstrates an unclear flow and transition.
|
Use of Graphics
|
All
graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of
the presentation.
|
A few graphics are not attractive but
all support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few
do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
Several graphics are unattractive AND
detract from the content of the presentation.
|
Background
|
Background
does not detract from text or other graphics.
|
Background does not detract from text
or other graphics.
|
Background does not detract from text
or other graphics.
|
Background makes it difficult to see
text or competes with other graphics on the page.
|
Spelling and Grammar
|
Glog has
no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Glog has 1-2 misspellings, but no
grammatical errors.
|
Glog has 1-2 grammatical errors but
no misspellings.
|
Glog has more than 2 grammatical
and/or spelling errors.
|
Originality
|
Glog
shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are
presented in a unique and interesting way.
|
Glog shows some originality and
inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
|
Glog shows an attempt at originality
and inventiveness in some parts.
|
Glog is a rehash of other people's
ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
|
Effectiveness
|
Project
includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the
topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
|
Project includes most material needed
to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two
key elements. It is an adequate study guide.
|
Project is missing more than two key
elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
|
Project is lacking several key
elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
|
Organization
|
Content
is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
|
Uses headings or bulleted lists to
organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
|
Content is logically organized for
the most part.
|
There was no clear or logical
organizational structure, just lots of facts.
|
Buttons, Navigation, and Links
Exertion
|
Buttons
are appropriately labeled and all similar buttons and links work correctly.
|
Buttons are appropriately labeled.
Most similar buttons and most button and links work correctly.
|
Buttons are appropriately labeled.
Many of the buttons and links work correctly.
|
Buttons are not adequately labeled
and fewer than 75% of the buttons and links work correctly.
|
Sources
|
All
sources are correctly cited.
|
Most sources are correctly cited.
|
Few sources are correctly cited.
|
No sources are correctly cited.
|
Layout
|
The glog
has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all
important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used
effectively to organize material.
|
The glog has an attractive and usable
layout. It is easy to locate all important elements.
|
The glog has a usable layout, but may
appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements.
|
The glog is cluttered looking or
confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.
|
All and all this rubric has really
helped me when developing Glogs for my students and I am very pleased with my
work. After the initial glog on Main
Idea, my students were very satisfied and they asked me to create
more. Not only did I use these Glogs for whole group classroom instruction, but
I also used it in individual learning stations and as a re-teaching method for
my struggling students.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)